A lot of people want to avoid the direct object agreement – what do you think? Read the article and chat on Facebook: Have you seen Romain`s new bike? This is it. [«Roman`s new motorcycle» is the direct object; in the first sentence, it does not conform to the verb; in the second sentence, the personal pronoun «the» is the direct object that replaces «Roman`s new motorcycle»; the old «bought» stake therefore agrees with it.] [Who is washed?» –> «They.» The subject is therefore the recipient of the appeal, there is consensus.] The rules of agreement of past participants are different. The fundamental principles are: This also applies only to pronouns of individual direct objects. For plural pronouns, just think of the agreement of numbers. In the following examples, they refer to the male plural and the female plural apples, and this does not change in front of a verb beginning with a vowel: if there is a direct object that is the recipient of the action, then the rules of agreement are the same as with having: the past participation corresponds to the direct object when it is placed in front of the verb and does not agree when placed after it. Stay in line for the second part of this series, which will focus on the pronouns of indirect objects. Oh, my goodness! In the first example, the le de l`see refers to silence. In the second, the la of the fact/makes it refers to the onion pie. The two examples show a different rule that applies to all pronouns of individual direct objects (me, te, le and la): if the verb that comes after the pronoun begins with a silent vowel or h, the e or a pronoun is abandoned and replaced by an apostrophe (it is called elition).
That is why you have the bid instead of the bid, hear it instead of hear it, and call you instead of you. But the verbs have to be approved in a very specific construction: the participatory past must agree with the direct object if the verb moves forward. The only other delicate aspect of the pronouns of French direct objects occurs in the past (composed past). If you have a female singular, a female plural or a male pronoun in the direct plural before a verb in the compound past, you must ensure that past participation corresponds in number and sex with the name to which you refer: [Who/what is washed?-> «hands».» «Hands» is the direct object and is placed according to the verb, disagree.] 5) For semi-auxiliary verbs, there is no correspondence with the direct object, because the object always belongs to the infinitive, not the semi-auxiliary object. Direct object pronouns have the same function in French as in English, with some important distinctions. What is most remarkable is that in English, the direct object always follows the verb, in French it is always present (except in the imperative, as we said in a previous lesson): a direct object is a noun that receives the action of a verb, such as the word «cookie» in the phrase «I eat the cookie». He usually answers the question «What?» or «Who?» («What do I eat? The cookie. A direct object pronoun replaces the direct object if it is already implied. So instead of «I eat the cookie,» you could just say, «I`m eating it.» The pronouns of singular direct objects (the and the) of the third person have the same sex as the name to which they refer: They washed their hands.
«They washed their hands. me (me) us (us) te (you) you (you) the (him, it) the (them, masculine and feminine) the (her, it) The hands they washed. The hands they washed. The compound past (now perfect) is a tension frequently used to refer to a finite action, an event, etc. in the near past.